I honestly think someone is just rating them all low for some reason. I would have liked to see the eyes a little cleaner (reflections are a bit much for me) but it's still a great shot.
Yea, community voting is whack. I post images and get low low low scores but then get a 7 from Peter, so w/e. I've seen it time and time again with other photographers work in here too - low community, higher by Peter (or whoever runs a competition that week).
I know I'm learning a lot still, but some times I have to remind myself that the community can be so off base and it's usually someone trying to bump their own image on the 'sort by lookability' aspect..
I mean, it's from an associate photographer who's been signed off on by Peter, so not sure what to add. It's literally following the Associate Roadmap for lighting, retouching, etc.
Personal preference is personal preference, that I understand too,
6 Comments
A THREE? Whoever voted this a 3 is delusional.
agree!!!
I honestly think someone is just rating them all low for some reason. I would have liked to see the eyes a little cleaner (reflections are a bit much for me) but it's still a great shot.
Yea, community voting is whack. I post images and get low low low scores but then get a 7 from Peter, so w/e. I've seen it time and time again with other photographers work in here too - low community, higher by Peter (or whoever runs a competition that week).
I know I'm learning a lot still, but some times I have to remind myself that the community can be so off base and it's usually someone trying to bump their own image on the 'sort by lookability' aspect..
the retouching let it looks artificial.
I mean, it's from an associate photographer who's been signed off on by Peter, so not sure what to add. It's literally following the Associate Roadmap for lighting, retouching, etc.
Personal preference is personal preference, that I understand too,
Log in or Create an account to post comments.