Peter defines "Lookability" as “A measurement for an image's ability to secure attention from an onlooker.”
1 - 6: Toast em' - These aren't portfolio worthy. Headshot Crew photographers should be producing work much higher than average
7: These can stay (for now) but you should be working to get something better to replace them.
8 - 10: These are high quality headshots and should stay in your portfolio.
A measurement for an image's ability to secure attention from an onlooker.
In Peter's book: A shabangin' shot that makes you want to stare at that sucker!
8 Comments
Hell ya! Love this
wtf, a SIX?! This isn’t even my image and that seems so low. C’mon now.
FIVE sixes. I don’t trust anyone voting in this, wow.
Poll.
Can’t attend live lol.
Peter defines "Lookability" as “A measurement for an image's ability to secure attention from an onlooker.”
1 - 6: Toast em' - These aren't portfolio worthy. Headshot Crew photographers should be producing work much higher than average
7: These can stay (for now) but you should be working to get something better to replace them.
8 - 10: These are high quality headshots and should stay in your portfolio.
https://headshotcrew.com/coaching/lookability
https://headshotcrew.com/faqs/lookability
In the Headshot Crew "lookability" is defined as:
A measurement for an image's ability to secure attention from an onlooker.
In Peter's book: A shabangin' shot that makes you want to stare at that sucker!
https://headshotcrew.com/post/388563
There is no way this is a 6. I’m sorry.
I agree. And that's my point. Look at the scale. This is a keeper.
If the primary definition is "an image's ability to secure attention..." then this has it
This photo would 100% get paying work.
Log in or Create an account to post comments.